Historic $35.8M Wage Recovery Judgment in Pennsylvania for Healthcare Workers

In recent news, the U.S. District Court of Pennsylvania Western District awarded $35.8 million in back wages and damages to 6,000 current and former healthcare workers.

The Case: U.S. Department of Labor vs. Samuel Halper and CHMS Group

The Court: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania

The Case No.: 2:18-cv-1608

The Allegations: U.S. Department of Labor vs. Samuel Halper and CHMS Group

The action was initiated following an extensive Department of Labor investigation that uncovered systemic FLSA violations at 15 western Pennsylvania nursing, rehabilitation, and assisted living facilities. The federal investigation revealed that the facilities that engaged in the alleged violations were under the management of Samuel Halper and his payroll office, CHMS Group. The Defendant allegedly failed to pay their employees for all hours worked (including during meal breaks) and did not correctly calculate overtime pay.

The Defendant: U.S. Department of Labor vs. Samuel Halper and CHMS Group

The defendants in the case, U.S. Department of Labor vs. Samuel Halper and CHMS Group, include the corporate entities of 15 healthcare facilities, their owner and CEO, Samuel Halper, and CHMS Group, the payroll administration firm. The court found that these entities willfully disregarded FLSA requirements by misclassifying workers, omitting crucial compensation elements from overtime calculations, and keeping inaccurate employment records.

The Case: U.S. Department of Labor vs. Samuel Halper and CHMS Group

The case concluded after a rigorous 13-day bench trial featuring 50 witnesses and over 600 exhibits. The legal proceedings began with a lawsuit filed by the Department of Labor in 2018 after the employers refused to rectify their violations administratively. The trial underscored the employers' deliberate non-compliance with labor laws, leading to substantial financial and operational penalties, including permanent injunctions against further violations.

A Pivotal Moment for Labor Rights Enforcement:

This case is pivotal for labor rights enforcement, particularly within the healthcare sector. It serves as a powerful reminder of employers' legal responsibilities towards their employees and the severe consequences of neglecting these duties. For workers in California and across the U.S., this ruling reinforces the protections afforded under the FLSA and demonstrates the government's commitment to ensuring fair wage practices. Additionally, it provides a crucial precedent for future cases.

If you have questions about filing a California wage and hour lawsuit, please get in touch with Blumenthal Nordrehaug Bhowmik DeBlouw LLP. Knowledgeable employment law attorneys are ready to assist you in various law firm offices in Riverside, San Francisco, Sacramento, San Diego, Los Angeles, and Chicago.

Parents File Wrongful Death Lawsuit After Teen's Death Following Physical Altercation at Halloween Parrty

In a heart-wrenching case that has captured the attention of the community, the parents of 16-year-old Preston Lord have filed a wrongful death lawsuit following his tragic death at a Halloween party in Queen Creek last year.

The Case: Nicholas N. Lord v. Talan A. Renner, Travis and Rebecca Renner, Treston J. Billey, William O. Hines, Jacob R. Meisner, Anthony and Wendi Meisner, Dominic Turner, Taylor R. Sherman, Talyn R. Vigil, Roberto and Emily Correa, et al.

The Court: The Superior Court of Arizona of Maricopa County

The Case No.: CV2024-018033

The Plaintiffs: Nicholas N. Lord v. Talan A. Renner

Preston Lord, a teenager whose life was cut short by violence at a social gathering, is represented by his grieving parents. They have initiated legal action not only against those directly involved in the attack but also against the homeowners where the party occurred and the parents of one of the accused. The lawsuit addresses the broader circumstances and alleged negligence contributing to Preston's untimely demise.

The Defendants: Nicholas N. Lord v. Talan A. Renner

The defendants in this complex case include several teenagers and young adults charged with murder in connection to Preston's death, alongside their parents and the homeowners, Roberto and Emily Correa. The Correas are accused of negligence for allegedly failing to supervise a large gathering at their home where alcohol was provided to minors. Additionally, the parents of Talan Renner, one of the teens charged, are accused of failing to control their son despite his known violent tendencies.

Case History: Nicholas N. Lord v. Talan A. Renner

The incident, which occurred outside a Halloween party on October 28, led to Preston's death two days later. The ensuing lawsuit filed by his parents targets multiple parties for their roles in creating the environment that allowed such a tragedy to occur. It highlights issues of parental responsibility, homeowner accountability, and the alleged failure to prevent foreseeable risks at social events aimed at teenagers.

The Case: Nicholas N. Lord v. Talan A. Renner

This lawsuit underscores a critical message about the importance of vigilance and responsibility in hosting social events, especially those involving minors. For California workers and all residents, it serves as a somber reminder of the legal responsibilities adults hold in safeguarding young individuals. The case is pivotal for seeking justice for Preston and potentially setting precedents on how similar future incidents are legally addressed, emphasizing the serious implications of negligence and the duty of care owed by parents and homeowners. This tragic case could lead to more stringent measures in supervising teen gatherings, potentially curbing the pervasive issue of teen violence in communities.

If you have questions about filing a California wrongful death lawsuit, don't hesitate to contact Blumenthal Nordrehaug Bhowmik DeBlouw LLP. Discuss your situation today with one of the experienced wrongful death attorneys in our various law firm offices in San Diego, San Francisco, Sacramento, Los Angeles, Riverside, and Chicago.

Heartbreaking Tragedy at Hyatt Ziv Results in Wrongful Death Lawsuit

In a devastating incident that underscores critical issues in resort safety, a young toddler tragically lost his life after falling from a ninth-floor window at the Hyatt Ziva hotel in Puerto Vallarta, Mexico. This case has led to a wrongful death lawsuit, spotlighting the dire consequences of safety oversights in the hospitality industry.

The Case: Family of Nico Carter v. Hyatt Hotel Corp.

The Court: San Diego Federal Court

The Case No.: 23CV1838 BAS AHG

The Plaintiff: Family of Nico Carter v. Hyatt Hotel Corp.

The lawsuit is filed by the grief-stricken parents, James Carter and Anastasia Duboshina, who suffered the unbearable loss of their 23-month-old son, Nico Carter. The tragedy occurred when Nico fell through an unprotected window that was missing its pane, a safety hazard that went unnoticed until it was too late. The heartbroken parents are now seeking justice for Nico, aiming to ensure that such a preventable tragedy never recurs in any hotel or resort setting.

The Defendants: Family of Nico Carter v. Hyatt Hotel Corp.

Hyatt Hotels Corporation, the defendant in this case, is accused of negligence in failing to maintain safe premises at their Hyatt Ziva location in Puerto Vallarta. The lawsuit alleges that the hotel did not adhere to necessary safety protocols, including ensuring that all windows, particularly those on higher floors, were secure and protected to prevent such accidents.

Case History: Family of Nico Carter v. Hyatt Hotel Corp.

The incident, which took place on October 11, 2021, led to the lawsuit filed in San Diego Federal Court. It claims that Hyatt Hotels Corporation misrepresented the safety of their facilities, directly leading to Nico’s fatal accident. This case raises significant questions about enforcing safety standards and the accountability of large hospitality entities.

The Case: Family of Nico Carter v. Hyatt Hotel Corp.

This tragic case is a crucial reminder of the importance of stringent safety measures in the hospitality industry. For California workers and residents, it underscores the potential dangers in public accommodations and the need for vigilant enforcement of California employment law and safety regulations. The lawsuit seeks justice for Nico and aims to serve as a deterrent against the negligence that too often underpins such heartbreaking losses. This case is a call to action for all hotel operators to prioritize guest safety to prevent future tragedies.

If you have questions about filing a California wrongful death lawsuit, please contact Blumenthal Nordrehaug Bhowmik DeBlouw L.L.P. Experienced wrongful death attorneys are ready to assist you in various law firm offices in San Diego, San Francisco, Sacramento, Los Angeles, Riverside, and Chicago.

Marriott Hotel Services, LLC Faces PAGA Lawsuit Over Alleged Labor Code Violations in California

Marriott Hotel Services, LLC is currently under legal scrutiny for purportedly failing to adhere to California's stringent labor laws regarding meal and rest breaks, a case that highlights the ongoing issues surrounding workplace rights in the hospitality industry.

The Case: Rodel Eugenio v. Marriott Hotel

The Court: Santa Clara County Superior Court

The Case No.: 24CV442763

The Plaintiffs: Rodel Eugenio v. Marriott Hotel

Marriott Hotel Services, LLC employees have initiated a lawsuit under the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA), alleging that the company systematically denied them meal and rest breaks mandated by labor laws. Specifically, the lawsuit claims that staff members were often forced to work beyond four hours without the ten-minute rest periods legally required, impacting their health and well-being.

The Defendant: Rodel Eugenio v. Marriott Hotel

Marriott Hotel Services, LLC, a major player in the hospitality sector, is accused of violating multiple sections of the California Labor Code, including those related to timely wage payment, meal and rest breaks, and accurate wage statement provisions. This lawsuit highlights employees' challenges in environments where operational demands often overshadow regulatory compliance.

Case History: Rodel Eugenio v. Marriott Hotel

The PAGA-only action filed in the Santa Clara County Superior Court seeks to enforce California labor laws not just for the benefit of Marriott's employees but also as a broader enforcement action reflecting state labor policy. The case emphasizes the role of PAGA in allowing employees to act as private attorneys general to pursue penalties for violations that broadly affect the public interest.

The Case: Rodel Eugenio v. Marriott Hotel

This legal action against Marriott Hotel Services, LLC is crucial for California workers, particularly in the hospitality industry, as it underscores the importance of upholding state labor laws designed to protect workers' rights. The outcome of this lawsuit could reinforce the responsibilities of employers to provide legally mandated breaks and adhere to all aspects of California overtime law, ensuring that employees receive the rest and compensation they are entitled to. For the broader workforce in California, this case highlights the protective mechanisms, like PAGA, that empower employees to hold employers accountable and foster a fairer work environment statewide.

If you have questions about how to file a California Class Action employment law lawsuit, please don't hesitate to contact Blumenthal Nordrehaug Bhowmik DeBlouw LLP. Their experienced employment law attorneys are ready to assist you in various law firm offices in San Diego, San Francisco, Sacramento, Los Angeles, Riverside, and Chicago, empowering you to take action.

JCS Central, Inc. Faces Lawsuit Over Wage and Overtime Violations in California

JCS Central, Inc. is currently embroiled in a significant legal battle over alleged violations of California employment law, specifically concerning the accurate payment of wages and overtime.

The Case: Angeles Lucero Hernandez v. JCS Central, Inc.

The Court: Los Angeles County Superior Court of the State of California

The Case No.: 24STCV17078

The Plaintiff: Angeles Lucero Hernandez v. JCS Central, Inc.

The plaintiff in the case, Angeles Lucero Hernandez, filed a labor law class action lawsuit on behalf of JCS Central, Inc. employees, claiming that the company failed to record and compensate them for all hours worked accurately. Allegations include not paying for overtime and requiring employees to use personal cell phones for work without reimbursement, a direct violation of California Labor Code 2802, which mandates that employers must cover all necessary expenditures incurred in the performance of job duties.

The Defendant: Angeles Lucero Hernandez v. JCS Central, Inc.

The defendant in the case, JCS Central, Inc., is a prominent company in its industry. The company stands accused of several infractions against the California Labor Code. These include failing to provide accurate wage statements, not compensating for all hours worked, especially those off the clock, and neglecting to pay minimum wage for these unrecorded hours. The lawsuit highlights systemic issues within the company's timekeeping and payroll processes.

Case History: Angeles Lucero Hernandez v. JCS Central, Inc.

Angeles Lucero Hernandez v. JCS Central, Inc. underscores a critical examination of JCS Central's compliance with stringent state labor regulations. The case delves into the alleged habitual failure to fulfill statutory wage obligations, focusing on the repercussions of such practices for employees.

The Case: Angeles Lucero Hernandez v. JCS Central, Inc.

Angeles Lucero Hernandez v. JCS Central, Inc. is a vital reminder of the importance of adhering to California's overtime and wage laws. It highlights the state's rigorous standards designed to protect workers from wage theft and underscores the legal obligations of employers to ensure fair compensation. For California workers, especially those in similar industries, this lawsuit serves as an important beacon for understanding and asserting their rights under state labor laws. The outcome of this legal battle could also influence policy and practice adjustments across similar companies statewide, emphasizing the need for meticulous compliance with labor regulations.

If you have questions about how to file a California wage and hour lawsuit or need to discuss policies that violate overtime law, please don't hesitate to get in touch with Blumenthal Nordrehaug Bhowmik DeBlouw LLP. Their experienced employment law attorneys are ready to assist you in various law firm offices in San Diego, San Francisco, Sacramento, Los Angeles, Riverside, and Chicago, empowering you to take action.

Jersey Mike's Subs Faces Class Action for Alleged Wage and Hour Violations in California

Jersey Mike's Subs faces scrutiny after a class action lawsuit raises serious allegations about California employment law violations, particularly regarding unpaid wages and missed meal and rest breaks.

The Case: Stephanie Immings v. Great Subs LLC, dba Jersey Mike's Subs

The Court: Orange County Superior Court of the State of California

The Case No.: 30-2024-01408266-CU-OE-CXC

The Plaintiff: Stephanie Immings v. Great Subs LLC, dba Jersey Mike's Subs

The plaintiff in the case, Jersey Mike's Subs employees, filed a lawsuit claiming the company failed to compensate them for all hours worked, including time spent on duties before and after scheduled shifts and during what were supposed to be off-duty meal breaks. The plaintiffs allege that such practices deprive them of earned wages and violate mandated rest periods, further asserting that the company failed to meet minimum wage and overtime requirements.

The Defendant: Stephanie Immings v. Great Subs LLC, dba Jersey Mike's Subs

The defendant in the case, Jersey Mike's Subs, is a well-known fast-food franchise operated by several LLC entities, including GREAT SUBS SC II, LLC. The company is accused of multiple breaches of labor standards determined by federal and state labor law. The lawsuit details a pattern of alleged neglect concerning employee compensation and labor rights, spotlighting the franchise's operational protocols as they relate to employee scheduling, wage payment, and break periods.

History of the Case: Stephanie Immings v. Great Subs LLC, dba Jersey Mike's Subs

The employment law complaint was filed in Orange County Superior Court, and encapsulates significant claims against Jersey Mike's Subs under various sections of the California Labor Code. Allegations include failing to pay minimum and overtime wages, not providing required meal and rest breaks, and failing to issue accurate wage statements, among other infractions. This legal battle spotlights the fast-food industry's practices regarding employee rights under stringent California labor laws.

The Case: Stephanie Immings v. Great Subs LLC, dba Jersey Mike's Subs

The Stephanie Immings v. Great Subs LLC, dba Jersey Mike's Subs case is critical for understanding the enforcement of California's overtime laws and the protection of worker rights in the fast-food industry. It highlights the ongoing issues within sectors that employ hourly workers and the importance of compliance with labor regulations to ensure fair treatment. For workers in California, particularly in the fast-food industry, this lawsuit underscores the legal avenues available to seek redress for labor violations and the importance of employers adhering to state laws designed to protect employee wages and working conditions. This ongoing litigation serves as a potent reminder of the need for vigilance and advocacy in upholding labor standards and safeguarding workers' rights.

If you have questions about filing a California wage and hour lawsuit, please contact Blumenthal Nordrehaug Bhowmik DeBlouw LLP. Skilled employment law attorneys can assist you at various law firm offices in San Diego, San Francisco, Sacramento, Los Angeles, Riverside, and Chicago.

The Huntley Hotel Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged California Labor Law Violations

The Huntley Hotel is embroiled in a class action lawsuit alleging that the company failed to adhere to California's strict labor codes, particularly concerning overtime wages and rest breaks. This legal challenge spotlights the ongoing issues within the hospitality industry regarding employee rights and compensation.

The Case: Jason Marello v. Second Street Corporation, dba The Huntley Hotel

The Court: Los Angeles County Superior Court of the State of California

The Case No.: 24STCV16122

The Plaintiff: Jason Marello v. Second Street Corporation, dba The Huntley Hotel

The plaintiff in the case, Jason Marello, filed on behalf of employees of The Huntley Hotel, alleging that the hotel has consistently failed to provide legally required meal and rest breaks. According to their claims, the hotel's rigorous scheduling and understaffing have frequently forced them to work through breaks and extend their shifts without appropriate compensation. The plaintiffs argue that these practices violate California Labor Code provisions regarding minimum wages, overtime pay, and rest periods and also impact their well-being and productivity.

The Defendant: Jason Marello v. Second Street Corporation, dba The Huntley Hotel

The defendant in the case, Second Street Corporation, dba The Huntley Hotel, operated by Second Street Corporation, is a well-known entity in the Los Angeles hospitality sector. It is accused of multiple breaches of California employment law, including failure to provide mandatory meal and rest breaks, pay wages on time, and properly compensate for overtime. These allegations paint a picture of a workplace that potentially prioritizes operational needs over statutory labor rights.

Case History: Jason Marello v. Second Street Corporation, dba The Huntley Hotel

The case, Jason Marello v. Second Street Corporation, dba The Huntley Hotel, was filed in the Los Angeles County Superior Court and highlights a critical examination of labor practices at The Huntley Hotel. The legal proceedings aim to address the alleged systematic denial of lawful rest periods and proper wages to hotel employees, underlining significant concerns about compliance with state labor regulations. The case continues to unfold, with both sides presenting their arguments.

The Case: Jason Marello v. Second Street Corporation, dba The Huntley Hotel

Jason Marello v. Second Street Corporation, dba The Huntley Hotel, is an ongoing lawsuit against The Huntley Hotel pivotal for workers across California, particularly in the hospitality industry. It underscores employers' need to comply strictly with California overtime laws and rest break requirements. This case serves as a crucial reminder of employers' legal obligations towards their employees and the serious repercussions of violating these labor laws. It also emphasizes the role of judicial oversight in ensuring that employment practices within the state remain fair and lawful, providing a safer and more equitable working environment for all Californians.

If you have questions about filing an overtime or wage and hour lawsuit, please contact Blumenthal Nordrehaug Bhowmik DeBlouw LLP. Experienced California employment law attorneys are ready to assist you in various law firm offices in San Diego, San Francisco, Sacramento, Los Angeles, Riverside, and Chicago.